Back to news and insights
Article

Determining a company's ability to pay regulatory fines

July 26, 2018

Authorities impose sanctions that will punish organizations and agents who have committed criminal offences, as well as provide a strong deterrent and incentive for organizations to maintain and develop rigorous internal mechanisms to prevent, detect and report criminal conduct.

When faced with criminal conviction over accusations of criminal wrongdoing, most companies view deferred prosecution agreements (DPA) as preferable. DPA penalties are assessed as multiples as high as four times the ill-gotten gains, this can be a devastating or even fatal blow for companies. Additionally, if in a downturn, multipliers applied to profits earned in better times could place a company in extreme financial distress and may deal the final blow.

Arguing a company's ability to pay can be very complex. If, however, it is successfully argued that the fine will affect the company's ability to maintain employment, strategically invest and maintain financial ratios such as debt to equity, then adjustments could be made.

Read FRA's Toby Duthie and Rob Mason's full article in The Lawyer where they discuss the best way for organizations to avert disaster is to engage experienced advisors at the DPA stage.

No items found.
Article

New York City Bar (NYCB) releases report on recent trends and developments in AI and digital technologies

April 23, 2026
Article

Unexplained Wealth Orders: Powerful Tools to Investigate Financial Crime in the UK

April 22, 2026
Article

10 years of Sapin II. From Compliance Culture to Global Strategic Asset

April 20, 2026
News

FRA announces closer integration with Relativity aiR to enhance investigative insight

April 10, 2026