Back to news and insights
Article

Determining a company's ability to pay regulatory fines

July 26, 2018

Authorities impose sanctions that will punish organizations and agents who have committed criminal offences, as well as provide a strong deterrent and incentive for organizations to maintain and develop rigorous internal mechanisms to prevent, detect and report criminal conduct.

When faced with criminal conviction over accusations of criminal wrongdoing, most companies view deferred prosecution agreements (DPA) as preferable. DPA penalties are assessed as multiples as high as four times the ill-gotten gains, this can be a devastating or even fatal blow for companies. Additionally, if in a downturn, multipliers applied to profits earned in better times could place a company in extreme financial distress and may deal the final blow.

Arguing a company's ability to pay can be very complex. If, however, it is successfully argued that the fine will affect the company's ability to maintain employment, strategically invest and maintain financial ratios such as debt to equity, then adjustments could be made.

Read FRA's Toby Duthie and Rob Mason's full article in The Lawyer where they discuss the best way for organizations to avert disaster is to engage experienced advisors at the DPA stage.

No items found.
News

FRA Experts Recognized in Lexology Index Investigations Guide 2026

May 14, 2026
Article
Event

Cryptocurrency and stablecoin dynamics in France, the US, and beyond – what arbitration practitioners need to know

May 6, 2026
Article

Challenges to Corporate Investigations Survey Report

May 11, 2026
Article

New York City Bar (NYCB) releases report on recent trends and developments in AI and digital technologies

May 6, 2026